There can be a portrayal, of the devil with the microphone (among the play of dichotomy).
Or matters like attempting to fill up a hole
The ruby slipper game is lame as shit type of portrayal as well...the lovers mind trap...
This may or may not be the case, though, I appreciate the freedom of speech, considering the informatic layer, observably and measurably, of a newer form does flip the script, even in terms of cultural meaning. Words as embodied truths, wouldn't hold a logic, nor is there a basis for it. Rather, there are these considerations, critical, non-critical, among informatic measures. So words can be okay. Talking can be okay, as there are ways of ensuring constructive outcome, as well as an understanding of the relation of these words. And, it's fun.
It's this odd dynamic of assertions of no need for words, just puppy dogs and love kittens for all, patriarchy, mickey inc, just look around at all of the magic, that's the ticket to life, which is blasting one's brain straight to the surface, in the mirror, numbing one down to trace the patterns of bad behavior typically dolled up in earth angel stylings (disengage, assertions of embodied truth, observe her, nice as ice machine), which does great for money laundering and trafficking...then there is the critical measure crew, matriarchy (Process Flow, Bee Stings, Bite, Fight, melt the nice as ice, break the glasshouse, expose smiling corruption), that isn't going to appreciate grabbing one by the hand in terms of sentiment, of which mickey will get a letter.
...and maybe the middle finger....That is, the word game notion attempts to irrationally portray argumentation and a meeting of the mind as one attempting to embody a performance of irrational agency, of no greater good other than embodied performance, of this top-down environmental ordering, that lacks a pre-justification, a logical basis, as to why one should or would embody a performance, and again of pre-justification not post-justification, considering we reason insofar, of bounded faculty, so that meeting of the mind is absolutely necessary in terms of stabilizing foundation, of grounding into stabilities of environmental consistency, of which if one cannot keep up or follow the argumentation, that wouldn't be word games, but rather one, of a particular value system, would note there needs to be inquiry and connection, again that meeting of the mind, if one is upholding again a particular order, of which they may not care to uphold such measure and might not even care as it is much easier to diengage such demand for rigor, and treat this body to irrational treatments as a source of authoritarian power, to reign supreme over the critical logical mind in a particular way that silences and promotes the violence toward one of this design, as one should simply serve as embodied subject for them, of a particular societal design, of a particular behavior, associated with violent societies. Like a good puppy dog or house cat, as long as one is playing up to feel good sentiment, then one is allowed to hold work and have a life, of the goosestep mentality, which wouldn't be citizenry at all, but rather something noted of in relation to religious state toward totalitarian regime. If the hollow body doesn't play up to the sentiments, then a play of never around, kill bees with honey ensues, along with networked racism, of hermetic jibe, of requests to cherry pick anecdotes and irrationally portray the mind that can be treated simply on the basis of sentiment, as an animal, even if all looks normal in the mirror. It's this matter that occurred throughout written record, and a behavior carefully traced before the Holocaust, including the first indication, involving aggression towards the artists first, of those emphasizing process, of the area that were killed in CO2 chambers. Many were surveiled and framed in relation to humane concerns for their mental health, and in the name of humanitarian cause, the policy makers determined it was best to assist with their struggles by killing them in these trial chambers before the holocaust. Again, of a particular human design, that a keep it tight group, on the basis of sentiment, hated, and in lock step, dolled up a s humane and peaceful, they pushed toward a trajectory, that by design, does result in wars and genocide, even if it "feels" good to be a part of a group that seems to make living so easy. The equation is balancing for everyone with little effort, and yet, that would never be the case. This is simply context in relation to this dynamic between matriarchal and patriarchal influences. Which crosses to Hypatia, the earth angel play, the all is happy, healthy, positive, would be the needed veneer to do some pretty horrible things to people of a differing design and it has repeated throughout written record, and it is a pattern that is aligning within certain regions of the United States, even as all looks happy and okay. The Olympics in Germany before the more aggressive form of death camps manifested, people at an event aimed for peace, upon interviews, upon the seeing is believing, therefore the air we breath mentality, noted matters looked normal, which is precisely what was needed for violent matters to proceed. As for the air breathed, as for the processes of behavior traced with the mind's eye...when it's so easy to live well, why care to look into such matters or take matters seriously. Especially when one is now FREE to doll up a mind of rigor as crazy, for example, one, full of word games. This is what I mean. When that veneer is permitted, to disengage and portray, and for one not of the same background to make assertions, without those of similar background stepping in to make clear one doesn't have that background, very bad things do happen, and it will start with those of a particular design, of artistry, of process, of class design that is the first trial of a peaceful, loving, humanitarian group, here to care in a way that is entirely disrespectful and lazy in terms of mental rigors. Why hold such mental rigors when there can be mental health, for example? We've been here before.
*Note Depeche Mode presentations resonate with Eleusinian Mysteries, think of Plato and Aphrodite Urania, so it would be odd in terms of referencing notions of patriarchy in relation to say these presentations. However, I am referencing the influence, of emphasizing matters of sentiment, precluding a meeting of the mind, which would be this irrationalizing measure. However, in terms of one bonding in relation to love beyond the surface, including caring in the way of holding rigor, of ensuring there is a meeting of the mind, an understanding needed for stabilizing foundation, by design. So likely, DM is emphasizing this love beyond the surface care, though without that meeting of the mind, to be purely sentimental, isn't going to bode well for those of a similar design on a margin in relation to those who are purely sentimental in a way that detests their design, as written record has traced. So I would say in relation to DM, be a bit careful on that one, among the upper echelons the message makes perfect sense, but I would say for the so-called lower echelon (material isn't such a big deal, creating is where it is) on these material margins, dealing with a crowd that flipped people making money into money making the people, worthy of respect, that message can easily fuel violence. We can hold love in our hearts, but that isn't going to be enough, when considering the pattern at play, what a purely sentimental state fosters. Animals are sentimental. Humans have a greater capacity that allows us to stabilize our environment. The arguments are to matter, if we are to remain civil. I think that has been in question though, as certain behaviors, that were not permitted in the US historically, of a sharp focus on even matters of fighting for, are now testing the waters. Why? Personally, I think assessments in the mirror and embodied performances, of looking the part rather than being the part, ill-found aims to make life easier, and the cost, the violence, can simply be handled by the next generations. Again, of this pattern among written record, of these times of corruption, that look so...upright, and yet, with a critical eye and mindful rigor, one can see, typically after the fact, the era of the polished pucker was full of shit after all.
