Just reflecting fast, on matters of members among a dichotomy, us-them and vice versa (and the band them are us too), of which the presentation of that dichotomy remains in the mirror, of which can then be used to make a dichotomy sandwich. To catch the one targeted, in-between, of matters involving violent disregard, of which the dichotomy in the mirror isn't actually the focused dichotomy of violence. So for example, we could have religious tradition 1 and religious tradition 2, of which one struggles to find peace, to unite, to understand, and yet, among both sides, minds not like someone of a particular nature will find themselves to be, thanks to a spin of intelligence on both sides, the subject of controversy. We could have other dichotomies in the mirror as well, such as ethnicity, arbitrary characteristic, geographic locations, etc...of which like minds each on the other side reiterate the dichotomy, the need to overcome the dichotomy in such a way that reinforces that dichotomy that is so useful at targeting the underlying matters of actual dichotomy, of which holds consistent measure, of this notion of patriarchy in relation to matriarchy, of which each will have their natures. I like Prince's Video Controversy to sum the matters up in a way that hones in on the play of the language itself, and the intelligence, that aims simply for controversy, as that is all that would be needed to drive the divide that aims for violence, as your earth angels in the mirror, emphasizing a need to come together to keep with the struggle for a better tomorrow, all the while that entire matter is gunning for the violence in relation to an actual dichotomy unspoken. This world is...violent, often times dolled up as nice nothing.
For me, I wouldn't invest in these TALK-TALK measures so directly. Rather, like painting, there is this form, and more interestingly, there is this newfound substrate with the capacity to produce dynamic interactivity among the splitting of category. It's a good art, and my focus hones in on these matters of design, of which the words will veil, in relation to the form traced, of this arranging form among interactions with a given environment. I actually enjoy this a lot, largely because of this internet form, of which I never even used it until my senior year in high school, so I have this outside-inside perspective in relation that will remain distinct to a very small age group that had that experience. And the words....the language, the development assumed of our communications, very much in question. My work does highlight how our communicative form isn't developed, even though yes, these splits to assist in highlighting the ways in which matters interact and arrange in our environment, albeit in a form too simplified to offer stabilizing foundation. In the future, post nor an form of dynamic forms of language, including establishing real-time tacit knowledge among aggregates, which will make the lives of those running the show...much easier, in terms of keeping matters from falling off the rails. There is this ability to succinctly establish the fulcrum points of such activities, etc...
It's fun to me, though it does take a lot out of me, at least when I was involved in matters of polemic. It's contribution, and the chapter has closed. Still, I have been reflecting, as I walk through that doorway, and simply do what I want to do, and that is to hone in my final endeavor, painting, and with a process that is thoroughly enjoyed and considers all aspects of the process, and it seems, these matters are coming together. I think of artists like Wolfgang Laib and Polly Apfelbaum. The really good institutional stuff where, to me, at least when I say good, means that there is such a meditative focus and love for the involved process, of which a viewer, myself, interacts with the manifestation in the museum, and yet, the object by design, doesn't dominate at all, rather I'm simply left to connect more so with this process the artist holds connection with. It's not so literal when I say this. Wolfgang to me though is an easy example to follow. Imagine walking into a large room, an open space, and in the middle simply a pile of pollen collected over a long duration, with color that seems to defy all colors seen before and inundated with, even on the way to the museum. Pollen? Of which it's easy for one to immediately explore what that would be like, in terms of a visual, sure, like a field for example, among mountains who knows, but then to be in such a field spending time collecting, in that way, the noise of the void, the connection...Something like that, since we are among this literal forum. Something different. Differences that make differences, and that doesn't mean for the others, but rather for the one who connects to that matter of actual love, which has little to do with bodies in the mirror. A space away from Dichotomy Sandwiches.
