My favorite part of this new form medium, is the way in which the activity can be observed. The matter can be used in a way to prop up irrationalizing context, like incessant video surfing, porn addictions (shitless purity rings on parade), the devil who loves words, words, words...so on and so forth. The issue though, among such a design, is there will be personalities, who follow the desire and motive, and naturally they will fuck with that motive and desire in a ways unexpected. I have those matters known to me and a few others. Similar to libriatics.org, which would be a new design, unexpected, there are ways of keeping tabs on matters, including matters of observation among employees, who seem to do what one order intends on doing to another order, in ignorant times, as the one, even on their own time, their embodiment, is in-need of falling suspect, though that's a matter from hermetic jibe, not so much out in the open when we are killing bees with honey. The intent, I don't assume as something bad...though among these performatives, among the ontology and epistemology (not word games) already established with my work, the entire matter, among my own designated forum can easily be misconstrued and removed from the context that I established, with rigor. I think the attitude is that, IF, there are enough irrational minds uniting, running the anecdotes, stringing along those anecdotes into a racialized characterization, by the very number, even if the method is entirely irrational and racist, one can steam roll over the one who isn't a proper embodiment, of irrational assertion, of a matter that lacks pre-justification, as if one of bounded faculty among a constituency of bounded faculty couldn't authoritatively call that irrational matter out. I am embodied for you, why? What establishes that basis, in terms of stabilizing foundation. If one doesn't have my background and isn't able to follow the arguments at hand (and it's fine, everyone can pick up some books and read, and even engage the minds), they then are able, this newfound "American" way, to unite by the irrational minds, play it irrationally by the numbers, empower to irrationally veneer over these matters and by such a design demand one, of authoritative logical design (not word games), to mindlessly embody for them like an animal. Absolutely not. It's not the American values system at all, considering citizenship is the basis, not irrational subjectship. But again, when the mindset is irrational, the focus is on how one embodies, and I do all to fail that irrational test, especially, when there wasn't an actual meeting of the mind first and foremost, and all measures to establish the very disengagement of a meeting of the mind that lends to strategic networked racism, like failing each and everyday to huddle with a team to assign tasks and discuss performance.
Now then there is that matter of sending someone who would fit the description of body in the mirror desires, which is obviously daddy bears. Which there is a daddy bear who is cute, but let's also be clear at PTC, when one says to a fellow supervisor I am a "real team player," and I have my ways of following certain matters, I'm going to fuck with you. It's how it goes...you want to show interest I'll just fling your ass across the frozen pond...I don't need a best foot forward, nor am I into folks who seem to, among their interesting file system, play oblivion when it's clear the records are on deck. So one can hold an interest, and yet, there, his secret networked place, operation freedom snatch, that entire play will certainly piss me off, even as we all look normal in the mirror. So glad a network is keeping an eye out, punning, as one has the potential of being one of their member's sex mannequins. Bravo.
Goverment can know and think whatever it likes...it's a regular camp training wheels these days....
