Again, it's not at all upsetting but the same tired play. A forced conversation using dichotomies in the mirror such as gay-straight, black-white, so on and so forth, and no that wasn't a coincidence along with ears closely afar, in a way to you know...get the hit job hearsay. Which okay so we asserted to me, someone I haven't ever had a conversation that trans is essentially used to disguise pedophile personalities. Hmm...that remark with someone you haven't conversed with and so easily dropping that line with J-Dog listening in. I wonder what that is about. Much like the assertion of people colonially differentiated as black using racism as an excuse for laziness. We've never had a conversation in our lives love, so why that framework as one converses along with ears circling about, attempting to look oblivious and yet that wasn't the case at all, much like J-Dog standing at the front of the department. It wasn't an accident, of which naturally I suppose that should have matters all caught up and yet let's be clear....
All of these fine matters in the mirror, of dichotomy, may or may not be the case. I would suggest beyond the generalizations and speculations, take matters case by case. Would it be about answers or asking the right questions?
What if we took the opposite of straight, like straight is used to cover pedophiles. There is that assertion, but it is obviously irrational, so there wouldn't actually be a need or place to engage a meeting of the mind, in relation to matters grounding into the consistency of design. But there is that play of racism and the cosmopolitan of the lose-lose bind, where it can just as easily be a morsel of irrationality to further irrationalize, of the one who didn't unintelligibly fight against the very notion of one who is trans couldn't possibly be something bad or underhanded where one embraces the dichotomy at the surface, rather than the dichotomy squared. Why that framing gay-straight pedophile. Why not black-white pedophile, or good cop bad cop pedophile, maybe strangers-friends pedophile. meaning the choice framing in relation to the assertion wouldn't be random or accidental and those ears listening in. It's clever, but absurd. Much like this notion of racism as an excuse. Again, consider...
That may or may not be the case, let's take it case by case. Specifically, to assert the matter without a meeting of the mind, is indeed speculation first and foremost. All can have a meeting of the mind so case-by-case would be necessary, if we again, are grounding into the consistencies of environmental design, much like we reason insofar, just as human as the next, bleeding must the same, out of a womb of which we do not create, which isn't this matter of commercial forum, but rather the basis necessary to stabilize an order, of some form of rational constituency, at least among this colonial form of thinking, which differs from the informatic form of thinking, not yet in western institutions just yet. And while we all have the best of intentions, and couldn't possibly be running an network hit, as always, there still remains the irrational engagement of attempting to assert dichotomies in the mirror, of framing controversial topics with those dichotomies, to converse with someone, in a way that intends the controversies of one among those plays of dichotomies, and yet, again, we reason insofar, these matters may or may not be the case, and still, without the in-between, we aren't getting at the dichotomies square, the dichotomy sandwiches, like conversing with one emphasizing process over supremacist allure, like say an intellectual-type, or types associated with post-modernity, or say one adept at tracing these abstractions among our behavior to consider what is actually at play, this need to hoist irrationalizing power over the one demanding rationalizing process, the one dimensionalizing among these fine complexities of context, that can be succinctly traced, contrasting with these conversations that intend on engaging in such a way to attempt gossip that runs with the dichotomy in the mirror play.
Essentially, it's this attempted trap of sorts...oh racism is an excuse to be lazy, of which to respond, no, is simply the embrace of the dichotomy in the mirror. It would irrationally assert on this irrational basis. Again, it may or may not be the case, but regardless of the speculation, we still can have a meeting of the mind first and foremost, and indeed, for rational constituency. Again, when the ties to the southern plantation are in the North East, and the slave trade tied to European power, as would be the case among all avenues, there are irrational and rational minds. In my travels, in those I have conversed with, carefully, you have the rationalizing minds of lower and upper lots, dealing with the same horseshit...the irrationalizing minds, skipping the books in a meaningful way, cultivating the very ability to trace patterns, including the patterns of behavior, this air we breathe, which entails more than mere seeing is believing, including the use of body-to-body dichotomies in the mirror while we converse. The person I was speaking with, while I do assume good, still the agency used, that is the environmental ordering necessary to even initiate the very process of the colonial language itself, was irrational agency, of no greater good other than embodied performance, of which assertions like pedophile, or lazy in the context of dichotomy in the mirror, would hold the conceptualization of bodies in the mirror; all of which props of the play of cosmetic authority that deems such a performance. The agency itself, doesn't derive authority though, as there isn't a pre-justification, to opt of such an environmental ordering, as their remains this arbitrary play...why does one need to embody for the other in the first place. Sure there can be post-justification, but the agency itself lacks a stabilizing grounding and throughout the layers of written record, this is the agency that takes hold, then grounding into the instabilities of group sentiment, destabilizes inevitably. It's just a matter of time. Something authoritative requires a basis that grounds into the consistencies of design, like out of a womb of which we did not create, reasoning insofar, invoking a bound that grounds matters, which is why matters of citizenry, by design, would remain distinct from say, plays of commercialism and subjectship, if a society is to remain stable.
I'm not so worried about this, and the utilization of these dichotomies isn't often followed, but the ears in-tune, very much so. I think in such times, refraining from positionalities and questioning in a way that brings assertions of the unintelligible mirror, again mirror dichotomy play, back to a meeting of the mind where the mindful process is emphasized over the supremacist allure. Where one can follow notions away from a simple dichotomy into how dichotomies actually work, which are generating the divide, in action, among ideas, to catch matters of process up between that divide, like Prince's articulatoin of this in his Controversy video. Ultimately though, the killing field, isn't a fight between two sides in the mirror, but rather a fight involving the group that likes the play of divide to target the ones who are to be caught up until they divide, of a design that is more in-line with notions of matriarchy rather than patriarchy, nto in the since of two sides of an aisle but a triad, of the group driving the divide, and the one desiring interactivity between, of a process between, like a meeting of the mind, to disrupt that play of divide. Those benefiting from such a divide, will gun in a variety of ways, including propping up people who are simply conversing to gossip, and yet how the conceptualized veiled to what seems like innocent conversation, coupled with ears of certain personalities in-tune to that conceptualization tacit among the conversation. And tacit, referencing tacit knowledge, like one finding their center of gravity of a bike, of a particular form of knowledge, where the rider doesn't have to be explicitly aware of their maneuvering to hold some form of competency, and yet, even if they are competent of their maneuvering, even if they hold forms of explicit knowledge, that doesn't mean the hold explicit knowledge in relation to such maneuverings. Much like one can observe a power point presentation on how to ride a bike, and still remain at a loss about the tacit form of such maneuverings until the get on a bike, to experience the way in which they achieve a center of gravity on the apparatus. The point being, that explicit and tacit are not inherently linked together, one doesn't inherently follow the other. We can maneuver well, but that doesn't mean we are so great at the explicit understanding and vice versa. We can veil ourselves toward an understanding among ignorance, etc.. Like Taoism's good through bad, bad through good, of this morphing or sorts. A lot of people are good at maneuvering but the explicit knowledge in relation to the tacit maneuvering, from observation, is rarely ever followed by most speakers. They speak, and yet the agency they are using, in use without a consciousness of it. The point, it's easy for certain minds to enlist and use others who are understanding their world in a way that lacks full awareness.
And again, this is among determinate spaces. The man on the run....the move me like a controller play...talk-talk...the depeche mode leave in silence type of matter. It's not matters challenging notions of the universal, like that of the non-literal forms, involving indeterminate spaces. I like both, and sure, I don't have to remain in this determinate space, but i do like tracing patterns as I converse. I find the entire matter intriguing, and attaining an awareness of the maneuverings doesn't come easy, but when one has it...it is odd. Much like my previous post of the movie Forbidden Zone, the lend of the colonial language, really does work like placing a paper bag over one's head. Is it evil? Not inherently so, and yes, when on the larger lot plan, there is a need for a power play to run matters.
For me, I'm the small fish, simply intrigued. Interesting world. Interesting conversations, all of which, may or may not be the case. It genuinely is a lot of fun to explore these ways in which we interact. Meaning, even if someone is on the power play, would that necessarily mean one is out to get someone, not likely, if you are a small fish. It's just, we need a language lent and a paper bag over the head, which will not work in relation to me, but I applaud the effort.
Again, I wouldn't assume these measures are hateful, but out of power play necessity. It works most of the time, as one's tacit aspects, involving this way in which one relates to the language, aren't likely grasped enough not to get lost among the muck of dichotomy play. It will not work for me though. It's entertaining however. I do enjoy the patterns, and it's interesting to see the words flow, the agency masked, and the one being aware as they are unaware, and I don't mean this as being smarter, or as an insult. Rather, it is a brilliant institutional form.
And yes, it's writing...yes it could be the ONE ON THE RUN...but it's obviously not, considering the pop culture play, the introductions to newer institutional form, of dynamic arranging capacity, something the Western Institutional System lacks entirely. I'm not so...headstone for the brokenhearted but we could always pretend. Rather, I reside among indeterminate spaces, and make determinate spaces my dirty little institutional slut. I mean, when there is that newer institutional form of dynamic arrangement...it flips matters entirely, by design, no need for this play of splits on colonial medium. This institutional form, by design, at this very point, couldn't actually keep up, which isn't to taunt, but rather to highlight the very fact a challenge is within the Western building, so what are these so called institutional giants going to do about it...the younger crew, many of us, expect nothing. Just the same song and dance of a time once when, while certain personalities look the part and fuck off with the rest. That could be a taunt, or...it could be something beyond the inundations of sycophancy and nice-nothing. Dynamic forms of language development, wouldn't have to be an actual threat, but rather newer capacities, newer forms of competencies, including these manifested practicalities of cultivating newer industry...but when all are to celebrate the emperors in new clothes, even if their shit smells...it's the gloss of perfection, of which all should know their place, of some form of obedience, even if they are pist whipping their asses with newer institutional form. It's not say that is the case, but there really isn't much to say when the matter has been actually done, no?
And sure, we all like our Western Culture...but there was a time, when it was an engine of actual innovation...rather than excuses and showboating...like make everything great again, which means, matters aren't so great, and yet, that's pushing a campaign. That's considered an acceptable idea by any American, to admit that as a good choice for the aggregate? To look to a past, to the good times...when? Like caravans toward a western frontier were all there to make everything great...again? Like that would have ever been the mentality of previous generations. Great....Again? Must we pretend? This isn't hatred or anger...it's cheeky, but not ill-willed. It's like we went from a colorful ball pit (like the one's we played in when kids), to maybe partying under a disco ball (big hair we don't care mentality), to something more reserved like ball room dancing (think Anna Wintour helmet, which is classic), to musty ball T-bagging. I mean we are all just...so enthused with EVERYTHING...Financial crisis, covid, tariffs, oh my! It's all so great again, and again, and again to the point of disbelief.
Not from a place of being upset. No. I think a lot of us are past that point. We are simply over IT. We'll just go through the motions while another group plays it by the numbers and sweeps any and all challenges under the rug...it may or may not be the case, but there is enough there to make anyone at least fathom all of these fine missed opportunities among great again swishes, and must nuts in your mouth dreams...
Granted, Art is the focus, much like I reside among these interactions involving indeterminate space. But tracing these patterns among mirror play...seems needed at this point. At least in attempting to crack the sychophantic crust that has resulted in some not so good scenarios, my favorite being the opioid crisis, and I mean that GINI Coefficient...if we all need to pretend. For me, I have all that I want. It's not so much about hand ups and hand outs, but rather violent orientations toward the American people, which wouldn't be simply words, but an actual violent manifestation without the proper give a damn to even go around.
It's odd. Maybe this is the future for everyone? And when it's opportunities like this, there's always drugs...snitches...and ho hos. THE PARTY IS HERE?...Mirror, Mirror...
