First, the tacit binder, among 40 instances of the component variables, is Art Mean.
The model was developed from the corpus of this site, which was crawled and compiled. CLICK HERE for the narrative.
For the full view of the model CLICK HERE.
Clearly the narrative discussed is about art. What does art acutally mean in the context of this narrative?
I will use the Hierarchical modeling for insight: CLICK HERE for the model.
I will use the Hierarchical modeling for insight: CLICK HERE for the model.
- So art references informatic narrative, like that of the language arts, so the informatic arts. The informatic would be the art that is.
- Then with art we have "Bridge Networked".
- "Bridge" references the notion of Mickey Piece, of the way in which power works, like Kara Walker elaborating on the role of silhouettes in our culture. Unless we are within a particular network, the Mickey Piece influence, the assessment on matters of embodiment rather than narrative process would be the basis, like visual cues or reviews of something written at a distance. We can all likely follow that trajectory. Unless we are familiar, all of us will work from certain measures that remain emphasizing externalities, like my facial piercings (a non-literal powdered whig of sorts, I earned it!), that can become indicative of something, and yet, in relation to activities, the context, can open matters up in a very different direction.
- "Networked" references, what might be the first ever informatic backhand, starfish inddustrialist. It wouldn't be the colonial intent, but rather of a consistency measure. So I, the narrator, would be focused on developing a bridge between my art and starfish industrialist for narrative chances, of promoting the process, not the Mickey piece spectacle. The associations with industrialists are critical, which is an obvious power play measure. Nicety is cliché and expected and it's not in relation to challenges of substance. This new design is a challenge. Like in sport, talk some smack. Again, though, the focus is on the informatic arts.
- This corresponds to the Tacit Binder, where Art Mean, would be this need to find the avenue in relation to this newer form I am working with. No one knows what to do nor have there been discussions, open, that explore the value of a language in society based on dynamic arrangement. We've been confined to static medium for thousands of years. Just recently this opportunity has developed. I see no activities, so I will keep lobbying, even if my head gets lobbed off in the process. This should be in the classrooms. This should be in universities, used among organizations, and when we have the infrastructure for a real-time informational feed of the entire aggregate, like a whole organization, there will be real-time tacit knowledge, of dynamic symbology in motion in relation to the unstructured activities of these aggregates. That wasn't even something imagined or considered. All of this, especially with what I have done, is on the table. It's all there. Waiting.
For further exploration, CLICK HERE for a dynamic highlight model. I will maybe tomorrow work through the intermediaries for further insight.
- So the intermediaries between art and bridge are explored.
- Narrative Machine largely involves the colonial cultivation, like this writing, where the impact of a machine, like a Gutenberg press, results in high volumes of unstructured information that obscures a basis, a consistency measure, when there is too much production. This obscurity, I think, fosters the ability for irrational minds to play with anecdotes and characterizations.
- Informatic Narrative would be some type of language designed based on dynamic arrangement, rather than static arrangement.'
- The Status Quo narrative would be some type of colonial form where the basis, the consistency, isn't likely a measure but rather a familiarity.
- Informatic Narrative Machine would be like our existing information age, where there is a high volume of real-time informatic production, which isn't going to happen today. The infrastructure isn't there yet. When it does happen, there wouldn't be an obscurity of a consistency measure. Rather, unlike today's informatic-erasure age, that is, too much colonial cultivation to hold a sound basis, the informatic, by dynamic design of arranging capacity, will always be able to achieve a consistency measure with ease, involving both individuals and aggregates in real-time.
- Constantine's Sword references Christianity obviously, in the context that there is an emphasis on embodiment, of gutting out the process in favor of embodied performance. So there is this frictional response to matters of creative play and innovation, of these matters emphasizing the process over the embodiment. The informatic production, though, with a form of efficient symbolic impression, of the dynamic arrangement, wouldn't hold a colonial context in terms of process vs embodiment. Rather, the form fosters a bidirectional relation that through the modeling can establish measures of stability, in terms of balance between the process and embodiment emphasis.
- Christianity, by design, will not embrace my work, but rather will desire ways of erasing my work, as would be consistent throughout the colonially written record, despite even good-intentioned protest of loving all and everyone (Which I do not believe in relation to actual experiences). That is, the informatic production directly challenges the assumptiveness of the colonial cultivation as it asserts the colonial form establishes a sound basis of understanding. That is, "his word" involves understanding on the basis of static arrangement, which doesn't have the capacity to respond to productions involving the dynamic forms of informatic method and informatic language, by inherent design. "His word" remains confined to the arbitrary arrangement of the colonial language, cultivated by the confines of static medium, like paper or rock. Today, we are not confined to static medium. We have dynamic medium, which now has an enhanced capacity to arrange the language itself dynamically. The colonial cultivation of static arrangement will, by static arranging design, fail to creatively respond to the language forms utilizing dynamic arrangement of informatic production, so yes, one might speak of a holy book, and yet, that book remains among colonial cultivation production, as a raw material for this newer form of informatic arts language. Of which, as the informatic production develops, as sophisticated language systems develop involving the dynamic arrangement, all colonial cultivations no longer establish the basis of tradition. The newer form establishes that basis. Likely, an outcome that will take quite some time, but still, yes, by the very design of my work, the leaders of the Christian tradition, emphasizing embodiment over the process, and emphasizing a tradition orienting toward colonial cultivation, will take issue with my work. Even if, I wouldn't hold any ill-will or focus toward this tradition, by design, my work will be problematic for this organization. Leadership would be inclined to denounce and erase my work, if the status quo is to be maintained. It would be within their interests, which has little to do with the emphasis on process, innovation, and developing the capacity of society. The commercial benefits associated with embodied order, obviously working in relation to the organization that emphasizes that form of ordering, emerge after the fact, and upon the benefit of, newer innovation, which again, involves minds emphasizing process over embodiment, such as creative play being emphasized over supermacist allure, exploration and discovery over a refrain from such exploratory processes to simply serve the needs of top-down organization. This wouldn't be antagonism toward, but rather, following and accepting how the designs of such orderings will be at odds with each other by design. The Church, obviously, upon reviewing record, wouldn't be such a great agent of change and certain minds have oriented toward violence in relation to those, emphasizing process, who bring about these changes. It isn't necessary, nor does it make sense, but when it's power without thinking, and the lay are asleep among their comforts, yes, violent matters can and have emerged toward a lot of activities involving innovation.
- Experiments would involve what I am doing now, of utilizing this irrational form of language, even if the explicit form is presented as sound. That is, by design this form that works from the arbitrary arrangement of static cultivation doesn't establish a stabilizing measure. To do so, would involve the dynamic arrangement of the language involving dynamic medium and informatic method. My work, like developing experimental colonial narratives and then calculating that narrative does bring awareness to the newer institutional design emerging, of something that no longer belongs to the colonial form of societal development. This would be very much a part of developing a bridge between the existing powers, the status quo, and the informatic arts, which in some ways, could be partly considered the new language arts.
- Folk (Heart, Institutional), which ties into my modeling of the entire Western Canon, where the emphasis on ancient materials continually references poor dears, of these minds orienting toward process over embodied performance. That is there is this dynamic between minds that adhere to a top-down ordering necessary to initiate the process of the colonial language, and minds that will adhere to a bottom-up ordering, of which those emphasizing process over embodiment, in terms of written record, have been at issue with those emphasizing embodiment (top-down) over process (bottom-up). The records reference those emphasizing the process, with certain socially acceptable derogatory terms, like poor dear, bleeding heart, or even bless your heart. This informatic form, representing a bidirectional environmental ordering, establishes an institutional form balances between such orderings in real-time, rather than, the colonial form that attempts to balance at points in colonial time, but ultimately, an overemphasis on the top-down ordering manifests, coupled with violence towards those emphasizing the process over the embodiment. So Folk, people in general, including culture that corresponds to the everyday productions, being associated with the notion of heart, like bleeding heart, and institutional, of a form that incorporates the process, inscribes the process into record for the first time, would represent their first institutional measure by design. This differs from the categorical split of opposites, among which the contradiction will inevitably emerge and collapse, by design, wouldn't uphold and maintain the integrity of processes emphasized. The informatic, unlike colonial cultivation, can uphold the integrities of those emphasizing such processes.
- Drab Wendy, is simply a painting that I did, and it was an attempt to bridge informatic with art. That is, I started with the informatic in a way that wasn't really certain of the context, as it simply could be some kind of instrumentation of analysis. However, over time, it is obvious that this is a newer form of language, and like language arts, connected to expression, a significant aspect to informatic activity would be expressions involving dynamically arranged symbols. The artwork itself was this interesting reflection of how would the informatic work in relation to language expression. Yes I could paint in relation informatic nodes, and that could be a way of expressing with the existing state of the inner-workings of informatic language. However, the colonial language terms, are simply a veneer for the values the nodes represent, so even to paint, it just seems more like the arts and humanities of the colonial institutional form attempting to relate to the informatic institutional design. This is why I decided to develop yet another narrative, among bridge.philosophycultures.com, with these considerations among the informatic method, arts, culture, and the challenges to the process, such as Christianity, and then run model, to highlight what is going on with this process. As would be the case with the language arts, this wouldn't be a science, and yet, there remains an understanding, a consistency basis, that even the sciences require to communicate. Meaning, even in terms of development, there is a lot of interactivity between, of which dichotomy framings do not work, like science vs art. Much like there can be bidirectionality among environmental orderings, among colonial disciplines, there will be ways of establishing something in terms of a communication, as well as establishing something in terms of a scientific method, utilizing informatic arts. Still the science use, that dileneation, doesn't happen until there is informatic arts, of a general usage of the informatic language, much like science doesn't happen without language arts, as articulated among written record.
- Intermediary nodes seem to be more about contextual consideration, as we aren't utilizing some hierarchical form to determine. Rather it's more about dimensionalizing in relation to a measured basis of the expression involving the use of the dynamic medium.
Outcome:
- This wouldn't be a conclusive mentality but rather reflections among the belief of new insight.
- Informatic arts need to be the focus. Like language arts before science, any informatic form involving science would still require the use of informatic arts. Considering this is a chrysalis of sorts, there wouldn't be an informatic language, but rather the initial stages, of the inner-workings of an informatic language in relation to the colonial language arts.
- I will take on a critical regard for the industrial and the church. Even as I lobby and protest in relation to the informatic, the context for this grouping is going to be commercial. That's fine, but I need to take issue with that, as the informatic arts develops, that development, wouldn't be merely commercial in scope. Rather, to reiterate, this is a newer form of language, a societal development, of which newer cultural forms will emerge, and yes, in terms of commercial endeavor, there will be a positive impact. The critical regard isn't this rejection, but rather a boundary line out of necessity. The orderings, by design, will be at odds inherently, so it can't be this fuzzy love nothing moment of embrace. There's work to do, so it's understanding the frictions among priorities and that scope, solely commercial, which wouldn't actually realize the cultural significance of this, including the much larger commercial impacts as the newer form interacts among all avenues in unforeseen ways. As a society develops a newer form of language cultivated by the dynamic arrangement, it would be obvious, all avenues will be impacted, and considering the enhanced capacity that can stabilize matters, it would be apparent, the changes would be for the better. This doesn't mean there wouldn't be growing pains, but a society developing an institutional form with enhanced capacity is certainly better for a variety of interests.
- I do go back to that analogy with the internet being like a horse strapped to a car. Imagine the first car is invented. No one has witnessed this newer use or newer capacity, so yes, for one working from expected use, assuming it's a futuristic horse carriage, is perfectly reasonable. Until someone unstraps the horse and then shows there is a newer capacity under the hood, people simply find ease in using the car as a glorified horse carriage. The internet, currently, is being used like a glorified Gutenberg press. We are currently strapping a horse to our era's new car. We simply adhere to the static cultivation of the language, as if this medium is like paper or rock. It's not. The medium is dynamic. We can arrange language differently, in a way that offers newer capacities. I am demonstrating an aspect of this newer capacity, of arranging the language dynamically, in a way that can, eventually, work in real-time involving fluid mastery, like our abilities with the colonial language today. Only we will have the use of symbols that can communicate real-time tacit knowledge for individuals and aggregates. This is something that changes the way in which we relate to our environment, of actual innovation. This wouldn't be simply bells and whistles to something that already exists. Rather, this is in relation to these newer evolving developments that have occurred within our time. I didn't even use the internet until I was in High School. It didn't exist. I didn't even know what informatics was until I was in graduate school, and the entire matter caught me off guard and the significance of the activity, of working with information not in terms of category, but rather arrangement, that significance was immediately sensed. It's as if the deemed internet is the amuse-bouche for what is about to come. I say this, not in the sense of promoting some sensation, but the sobering realization that we remain riding around in a car, the car of our time, with a horse still strapped to the vehicle like it is a horse and carriage. At this point, it should at least somewhat be sensed as embarrassing. The generations actually harnessing dynamic arrangement will likely find humor looking back, as we would at the very notion of riding around in a car pulled by a horse.
