R.I.P. Democratic Radio

...and I worked on music row, with artists, TN, not just country to help out people, I don't know that well...realted to them...but ultimately the model changed around the time I arrived. It's a turn off. Strictly business entirely, which even with the 80s themes and messages, sure, a network will call the shots. It's a lot of in-the-mirror type of play, but there was also this desire for the new kids arriving, their sound, something distinct, even if they didn't think or know it was there sound. There was some type of interactivity among democratic society, of free-expression, of the folks who didn't have much of anything but their own creativity creating a scene for themselves...which can also be harnessed in a way that marks a time. But the Mickey Model, patriarchical take over was in motion when I got there...so it's Britney Spears and Backstreet models...market data, by the numbers...genericide, that given a certain influence will place the music, the styles, the era, on repeat until the entirely social-cultural dynamic becomes a hollow plastic veneer of a former self, with stuck on repeat sameness that transforms the cultural flows of democratic interactivity into the cultural ice of democratic-looking sugar-pop, play it safe by the numbers, no new sound as the new sound. It's complete shit. Much like, I'm much older, so I'm not looking for some kind of expression in relation to my grouping. We are all turning grey and really I look at it...and no, it was this killswitch era for us. Grunge...to by the numbers market....and then a model of entertainment that resembles something seence in the old world models, among what is going to be the case but in such and absurdly obvious way...unless you have the money to pay up front, no, you are not "making it" of the mythology when at the end of the day music is like a business, much like selling...burgers. Still the powers were focused on movements of the time in relation to actual expressions, even if it was an act of power of moving choice artistry across the stage. And these were artists orienting toward processes not supremacist allure in the mirror. The types of minds who are definitely never going to sign up for something like American Idol. It would be a format that is the antithesis to the way in which the relate to their environment, again emphasizing process over embodiment...I think of Kieth Richards, who just was that kid learning the Delta Blues....I mean, the rest was sugar-pop nothing to the band name that even mocks the entire spectacle...Rolling Stones. They'll be the same personality just enjoying the moment, doing something they like...the rest...2 fucks kind of mentality. Let's go to the bar and let the spectacle machine have to itself type of matter. I'm not entirely sure if that may or may not be the case, but I just flip through some of the artistry in this symbolic impression narrative, and at the end of this, it is something that I want to list. Like Grunge, like Atlanta when OutKast was around, there still are these democratic activities. What has changeed with obvious manifestation, radio stuck on repeat, no movements, just by the numbers let's make a business deal in an obvious fashion artistry on stage...these movements are being scrubbed out of the American Culture machine as part of gutting out US Democracy. Yes, the music industry is a business, but that industry backed what was democratic, what was orienting toward the process, what was a new sound, a rigor of that process, that even people around would identify as democratic activity worhty of attention, worthy of acknowledgement. There was that type of matter. Is it a risk? Not really. Once the scene is opted-in, it's not like the scratchcard lanyard crew is going to argue. All just roll out the choice flavor of the era...or in my groupings era, the North Korean plastic factory by the numbers parade, which was kind of like a new kids/asian boy band/disney parade monstrosity. Meaning I've played music for decades...and the stuff that was produced...it's got market number hooks, and the verse-chorus type of construct...but in terms of rigors of process, there is absolutely no substance, even if the artists involved could do something with much more rigor. It's a North Korean style shit show with Mickey Ears dolled up as Democratic entertainment by the numbers, which isn't Democratic behavior at all. It's complete Mickey-Shit on a stick.

This stuff here, I'm not sure what to say of it. I know the key areas of entertainment activity like LA and NYC, there is popularity with this sound. The kids love it and there are personalities that seem to be able to carry the pressure cooker media machine...and still nothing. Silence. Crickets. None of this even exists. No it's that new and improved democracy as a veneer, with patriarchy at the helm, with entertaining promotions of a checkerboard, where bodies in the mirror strive to be superficially diverse, and entertainment is on different sides of the fence....new sounds do not exist, and all hair is to be cosmetically polished like topiaries....#NeverTheUnitedStates #NewUnitedStates #DemocracyasaVeneer #OtherInternationalDemocraciesasVeneersinSupport #FakeBullshitGuttingOutDemocraticScenes.....Again, a lot of interesting artistry...and yet, nothing that new on the radio...at all...Shocker. Patriarchy on the rise, with the matriarchical brew, her kids orienting toward the process, entirely being scrubbed out like ethnic cleansing because, naturally, it's all about the market numbers, even though that wasn't the American model, decades after WWII....But once that generation started passing on, it's amazing, how a new orientation toward American culture started setting fire to anything exhibiting a voice of a given democratic movement of the time...it happened before Britney and Backstreet. Mid-90s, after that woodstock...the Baudrillard DNA influence was growing strong at that time...TV as DNA for the people, not a representation of what's going on...of which the running ideas among power would involve that issue of reprentation in relation to presentation being obscured and confused, difficult to determine, so among the distortions we can embrace Baudrillard's work. A lot of it hinges on this notion of the information inundation machine, and yet, when we open up in relation to the informatic development, that obscurity would no longer remain. Movements can be represented and no, DNA, a groups ease of utilizing irrational cosmetic authority, a top-down asserted Simulacra, wouldn't be the obvious Deus Ex Machina. The informatic, the consistency measures, by design, would hold an authorative measure, a pre-justification, over post-justification cosmetic authority activities. Baudrillard's DNA isn't much of a matter any longer, especially in relation to the informatic methods developing, among which these democratic activities, these bottom-up movements among the artistry orienting toward the process can be determined, discerned, and even represented. It's just a good post, and a though I didn't explicitly articulate toward the end of this bridging, as I engage the activities of informatic arts.

You've got these kids and movements finding their own sound and their own voice, and you have this Anti-Democratic push among industry-classism, of a newly developing caste system, taht veils with the notion of in the name of the market, that is trying to scrub out all of the democratic activity. I'm old, so it's not my voice, my sound, my youth culture...but I can note of a variety of these movements, that once upon a time, among the democratic interests, the industry oriented in a way that promoted the democratic process. The given scenes were given the attention, actual risks were taken, and the new sound, the new voice, of that given era was on the main stage. Then again around Mid-90s that push for the industry machine to orent in a way that would gut out this democratic behavior, that would veneer over these activities ensued, and in this dark age, I was at a record label, put-off by the absurdity of it all, checking out entirely. There is this serious disconnect.

And again, for the networked seat of power, that that love for Baudrillard, in relation to the new and improved market model of entertainment, an imperial class push would correspond easily, again, like that of Japan or Russia, along with lines of money pumping in that can ease the American Institutional form into gutting out the behavior and joining in with these powers of accepting no longer democratic behavior but democracy as a veneer like them, which isn't democracy, it's simply winning the gear shift from WII. It's switching out agency while the American Military dogs, and industry class, of the actual democratic design, notice the switch without noting of the metaphysical plays that foster that swtich entirely. I'll never forget that social media machine ops bust in Seattle. I laughed at the entire matter, much like take note of that transition from Myspace to Facebook, college email only, to then the newer forms in the feed and the changing programming that promoted a psychology of understanding in the mirror, and the promotions of no greater good other than embodied performance, deemed good by a cosmetic authority, like Idol, American Idol, British Idol, and those demcocratic formats like star search of the masses controlling the voting entirely, not a panel, and even that differing agency or acknowleging bounded faculty, out of a womb of which we do not create, just as human as the next, of a rational constituency, of a citizenry, necessary for a greater good. I even take note of the political promotions, no longer as citizens, but as a divided camp where the American Citizen can still be a citizen with newer behavior embodying a performance for the better idea, again of that agency swtich of no greater good other than embodied performacne deemed good or bad by a cosmetic authority, that grounds into the instabilities of top-down group sentiment, of that environmental orienting design that establishes totalitarian format. It's not something readily gripped. Like the harmonies that contextualize space that color a realizable blue sky, this would be metaphysics, and like the blue of sky, that blue is very much an existence, though an intangible act, taht can easily usurp power over any country, when minds are in the mirror, loving their social media. Agency of course being that environmental ordering necesary to initiate the very process of language, of that bottom up, of some rationalizing bound, like reasoning insofar, just as human, bleeding the same, meeting of the mind first and foremost, of an authorative prejustification, of some measure that pre-justifies the use, which a consistency measure has that pre-justification. We are of a bound, so there would be a pre-justification, an authorative basis, to use such an agency that demands a meeting of the mind first and foremost, of a citizenry, of a rational constituency, with that corresponding behavior that disengaging that meeting is entirely unacceptable, of this bottom-up design of behavior. The top-down agency asserts, irrationally, there is no greater good other than embodied performance deemed good or bad by a cosmetic authority, again, grounding into the top-down instabilities of group sentiment. This is the form that will destablize inevitably, and the tired, poor, and hungry, always on the violent recieving end of that shit, came to the US and fought to have a societal design of a differing agency, which wouldn't embrace democracy as a veneer at all. Much like the irrational agency, of no greater good other than embodied performance lacks a pre-justification as to why one should embody a performance in the first place, of which the interests entirely, even among collegiate debate, in relation to Baudrillard and DNA Simulacra made a lot of sense as a lot of power and money decided against following through on the favors of the WWII generation to simply push for what's easy and convenient for them, an imperial american system embracing democracy as a veneer, the new play of cosmetic authority with their friends in other democracies as a veneer to bank roll their wishes, and when it's the era of corruption, the kids will certainly load up in the mirror and pursue (Social media, of particular designs, can help with this US agency switch)...holding the portfolios holding the industries to embrace the behaviors that will switch out the American behavior for a newer form that has nothing to do with American behavior. Meanwhile those in national security, the military, those tied to the WWII crew that lost a lot of blood, friends, and went through hell to keep America the actual societal design....have, at least in the previoius decades, done very little. It has been this oddity to me. What is going on, I'm not at all at a loss. I was around a lot of matters, and it's not hard to follow that push for a group to do this and to somehow be at a loss in relation to the changing behavior? It's easy to follow what is happening. I think the oddity of it is to observe those in charge of esnuring the US remains the US..caught up in what seems to be a chase our own tail formation, but again, when we get into metaphysics, it's intangible....there isn't this tangible affair. The battle fields are a lot of tangibles, at least the assumed visual of a battlefield would involve plays of hard power not plays of soft power...War is to be promoted visually, of which the promotions of mirrors, social media for example, have all seeing is believing and precluding the air we breathe, these processes of behavior switching out do not exist, and yet, they do, like the metaphysical blue of sky...and when kids of portfolio corruption are confident as they take note of the tail chase...but it is a serious risk and if matters get traced and highlighted...it's not going to end well for a group that attempted this in the United States...to gut out the country from the inside out, like what has been done to other old-world countries in the past...to go back to war, only playing now with soft-power play of war since these imperial powers lost the hard power game once WWII ended. And even to consider Heidegger's Being and Time, and he was with the Nazi Regime, and yet, he even highlights a lot in terms how this psychology, this metaphysical play, where families tucked away in Europe, among a long line of tradition, know how to get their hands on the right levers and play a soft-power game to destroy a country entirely, as the eyes to the surface remain at a loss as to why they have lost control. Agency influences ideas, actions, habbits, behaviors, and character...to flip the switch, run the mirroring distortion machine in such away as to promote an understanding of the world and country as ideas, actions, habbits, behaviors, and character, to remove the tacit form from consideratoin, like understanding one's distinct center of gravity to actually ride a bike, again the tacit form, something not found in a power point presentation explicitly stating how to ride a bike, that removal is easy to establish, if that is the desire, to gut everything out for the United States. All can be understood about the country in an explicit form, again, like ideas, influencing, as the basis. And yet, that explicit understanding, like acknowledging the fact, that if one never hopped on a bike before, observing the explicit information on how to ride a bike, isn't going to show one at all how to ride a bike. This is what I mean by tail chase. Where the explicit form, like the blue of paint, not the blue of sky becomes the guiding principle even for US National Security. The tacity form, the metaphysical form, never in the equation in terms of protections for the United States, of which opens the door for these finely tuned families to destroy it. When one is fighting freedom with a gun, like attempting to paint the blue sky by chunking blue paint toward it, the effort is there of course, but to fail in following the plays of soft-power battle, will leave one in their democratic endeavors (not mere visual veneer, of the same symbols with a different behavior) at a loss, as all measures, all steps taken, will by design, deliver a fruitless result as a group takes over. Even if those setting it all up, offer an easy down hill ride for those interested in national security...to be on that kind of bike with a power point presentaiton in hand, to explicitly follow what is happening to the US, to follow all matters and in that explicit way...the ease wouldn't be this assistive measure, rather the entire arrangement would certainly bloody up all that choose to walk that path. Meaning, again, if we ground into the instabilities of group sentiment, of aligning, of following explicitly without following tacitly, to adhere to the plays of cosmetic authority, to support the blue paint that colors the sky, this irrational agency that veneers as minds elevate toward the mirror, seeing is believing, by design there will be instability that occurs. The initial phase, among kids of corrpution, nice portfolios attached to their name, might seem easy and peaceful-looking, but inevitably, the repeat will come, the violence will be had, and typically it's always the newer generation that gets dealt the hellfire from those who embrace their own convenience and already followed the kids will pick up the tab...and as for sustaining the societal form, not likely if matters are permitted to continue in that veneering manner, of understanding matters in relation to explicit knowledge that will have all minds understanding matters at the idea, rather than the agency, the tacit ordering of the enviornment necessary to initiate the very process of the language, which means they understand explictly without understanding, and these powers tucked away can note matters are ripe for the picking. It's odd. This is a pattern on record, and yet, even among minds playing trivial pursuit with record, to trace the patterns, to orient toward matters tacit, the structural promotions of orienting a mind away from such tacit awareness isn't so difficult to do, and so, the violent repeat, the successful gutting out of societal forms of bottom up agency remain easily and play, and for the US, absurdly, on the verge of being entirely successful. That agency switch, of tacit design, is key.

Again, I'm doing this on the final posts, because it's simply those thoughts, in relation to Baudrillard DNA, and how informatics relates to the assertion, of somehow the information inundation machine is ringing in a new era of imperial authority in the United States, where a group can now behave like a Meiji Dynasty for the United States...that there is no alternative that reasserts bottom-up agency when there is so much mirroring distortion within the country. Just embody. It's easy. Be kind. Be happy. Don't think, of this removal of the bound, of the constituency, of the behaviors of citizenry necessary for a greater good. Rather, it's not greater good then embodying for this american imperial court on the rise, newer agency, the DNA game, in-hand, with pats on the back from their hollowed out egg-shell "democracy" friends. To succumb to this inevitable mirroring confusing, this influx of categorical splitting, to accept the erasure by a disco ball ad-infinitum, that isn't the case at all. Informatics can work with a ongoing influx of continuous informational feeds with ease and clarity, communicating clarifying ease in relation to individuals and aggregates, of which the dsign itself, the dynamic arrangement, eclipses the existing institutional forms around the world, and is very much in line with the tradition of the United States, of tracing out that unforeseen frontier, of which, the fires remain brewing, as a free society opens up to this newer process of innovation that will have significant impacts in all avenues throughout the world, in that the dynamic form of cultivation invovles the very root of all institutional foundation, and the dynamic design, very much harnessing the institutional records of tacit knowledge, including what all cultural-commercial forms wish they could have today involving real-time tacit knowledge. So again, this absurd play of my generational era among a group of aspiring to be the new american imperial fuckwits...it will fail entirely if the democratic tradition, of corresponding tradition, is re-asserted, and this budding emergence of the nest wave of innovation, very much pushed by those who follow the distinct role of the United States, to drive that innovation, so the rest of the world too can, upon significant maturities, harness and improve. Again though, when it's kids of corrpution, with nice portfolios attached to the name, and a need for the ease and laziness of convenience, these interests, this love for Baudrillard, I get IT. The soft power war seems like such an easy win for you backed by the money flows of a democracy as a veneer global imperial court. Who could possibly highlight these matters, and yet, to have such matters highlighted and to take that risks. No, I think that is a mistake without recourse. When certain people do follow, and trace these matters for themselves, it will not end well at all.

And there is this humor....I think of an MI6 agent, and MI5, CIA, FBI, or any other special ops, with surveiling cameras, algorithms, paper, etc...there is a great deal of humor in all of it, considering my work in relation to static cultivation, of matters working in a way that would veil agency and the switch of agency. One of my colleagues, her dad is the MI6, and when I was living in Scotland, she highlighted how he began working for the order and he would sit in bars. No paper, no cameras, no smartphone holding the records, nothing other than a mind of a particular style, among these interactivity between, tracing that pattern, like talking to someone among their communications of explicit understanding, not following a mind that follows their tacit developments, as they explicitly understand and communicate devoid of tacit pattern awareness. It's odd. This veiled play, of something that I remember I would talk to my grandfather about it, someone who like me, didn't like smiling before a camera instinctively. I think of even the tired, hungry, and poor of the early forms, not exactly smiling before a camera, coupled with the absurdities of no teeth, when one can still smile without showing their teeth, and yet, no smiling. No, the mirror, that play with the surface and that veiling of agency to switch matters out, to reintroduce these tired, hungry, and poor back to what they were already accustomed to, unless there is some benefit elsewhere that looking good in the mirror play, that adherence to cosmetic authority has a cost; that peace for everyone in this era of conveniences, turns violent quickly, much like we have this innovative afford, still connected to the WWII generation now leaving, and the same cosmetic apparatus around the world, with these new and improved visual morsels are here to help all understand the rewards their cosmetic authority has provided, and yet this would be off the coat-tails of a very different societal design that acutally pushed the bulk of the innovation, along with they systems that protected the intellectual property, and yet, it's a sweet song, along with money pumping to encourage something entirely different within the US...and when the innovation dries up, it's going to be the same violent shit. But when it's a moment in the sun with a pretty good flow of money, just forget all of this, be kind, be happy....no need to understand the matter all the way around...just parade with the familiar looking symbols and champion the new day, the new behavior, and the new "American" democracy as a veneer class, supported by our global friends, deemed democracies, and yet the behaviors are not democratic....shhhhh. Of which, yes, I suppose there are those desires for me to be social. I get that. Sometimes I like being social, but when we consider plays of intelligence...when one empowered with hermetic jibe can smile to your face and explicitly discern among a tacit formation that one can't even follow, nor will they ever have that capacity, but to be among a network in the mirror, and with all that money...the glinting order is to be the Order. Since when? Will be curious to see how it all works out among these glued on angel wings and plastered smiles. Seems to be a "globular" affair...sweet like POP.

And reason insofar, and cultural trajectories considered like...



R.O.A.D.W.O.R.K. -HO(L)E- -G- RABB(I)-TRY hILL (Ulysses Olive Tree) #K(no)wSymbolicImpression?LangFORE-U. #ForU #4UClover #FOREFOR4. It's Piece, not Peace, that gets some peace, and yet, innovation, the informatic, isn't exactly looking for that holding hands skipping around a flower POT moment. When the foods not hitting the table, it's the polished puckers flowering ass-up for peace, imperial plays for new clothes, that run out the door when things start heating up...I'm not bleeding the heart crooning, like Telenovela, for something entirely superficial. Simply put, gut out the innovation machine, our global cosmetic victors are going to inevitably return back to the days of showing their violent asses when the WWII wave dries up, same shit new bells and whistles can carry matters only so far. Might want to cut the cash flow democracy as a veneer fuckery and hone in on these critical changes in relation to processes underlying all institutions and all commercial endeavor that will turbo-charge everything, so long as certain kids, portfolios in-hand, skyscrapers, power grids, and what-not, aren't snorting cosmetic glory sweet nothing, but everything seems so bubbly to partner up, until it's coke without the bubbles, when the sweetness is understood fully, of this undesirable outcome, flat-lining syrupy nothing, like the flat blue of paint; It's simply POP of the TOPS, to the sky, only to climax on the ground, like an archway rainbow seeking a pot of gold at the end, only to reside among a never ending circle, running everything in-perpetuity, Tong Zi Dan, the loyal are now out of steam, out of color, not of sky but the illusions of water, a play of refraction, split the light up, employ distraction, the eyes will see...lights out. It's not like a particular Ordering wouldn't follow these matters but do get your cameras and papers out...agents unite. All follow and in that way...much like the artistry on American radio emphasized the democratic design in the past, that would be well in-tune to this new form of entertainment by the numbers associated with cosmetic-authoritarian form actually means. Why have songs about a Happy House Sioux and the Banshees, when we now can have Karma? One form engaged the design of democratic citizenry, to engage the critical regard among the entertainment, while the other does entertain, and yet, in that religious-military feel-good, the sentiment is your new foundation, as the new way of the land is to be always on the rise, like a manic smile among the North Korean games Goosestepping to fuck off.