I don't take this form of language arrangement seriously. I hold an interest in terms of the impact of this form's rigid structure, like that of the Deleuze model where a Language::Based::Abstract becomes impacted on the basis of Single::Assemblage that would form concrete notion. I think in the opening of this ::Bridge:: as I shift modality, there is this polemical residue, which the structural arrangement will address. Meaning the work begins with a movement away from the colonial cultivation, as the initial phase, of the informatic, would be a transitional state, away from colonial institutional form. The modality, the mode, wouldn't be this self-deemed assertion, rather, the method and the comparative modeling, of colonial form in relation to informatic form will be the dynamic. This hasn't been done before. The bridge itself, would involve something like that of Deleuzian Refrain, of which matters interact between some form of endogeneity and exogeneity, like a consideration of, a between, among poles. Obviously, when we are interacting between an endogeneity and exogeneity there will be unexpected patterning, likely of a notion of chaos, of which we can respond in a variety of ways, at the Colonial level, and at the DeColonial level, of informatic form. The informatic models guide and structure, while among the colonial cultivation, even with AI, we have enhanced capacities of rapid growth, like that of a bush with some form of fertilizer. The unstructured form can grow rapidly, from inches to feet overnight, to offer an analogy. The informatic form, quickly reshapes the form into something meaningful, something guided, something that can work in relation to a larger scheme among an entire landscape. Similar to the landscape, I think of matters associated with modernity, post-modernity, his-tory, grids, systems of codification, capitalism, circulations (like labor and capital), and the materializing forms driven by the synergies. We have a new forest. This would be an informational forest, unkempt. I think there is a lot to explore and discover in terms of informatic experimentation and discovery, of which yes, there is the modeling form itself, like libriatics, but then there is the interactive form, of the informatic in relation to the existing institutional arrangement, like that of philosophy cultures, that works with something that might be a manifestation of Deleuzian influence, though I can't really say for sure. That is, to offer sobering insight, we are not of a Deleuzian time, any more than we are of a post-modern time, as there is this newer capacity to arrange the language differently. A time, where the basis of even education wouldn't need to begin from a book, nor would one, considering the flaws of the colonial arrangement advise this basis for anything educational. The book, of the colonial arrangement, would be a raw material that needs to be refined, before use. I do believe academia needs to begin with some form of informatic chrysalis instead. There is now the opportunity and capacity to begin with consistency measures first, to identify key concepts, establish socially normed methods, of which we explore those concepts, based upon such measure.
