"The narrative climaxes with a trial of morality against the backdrop of love, betrayal, and the quest for redemption, weaving a narrative that exposes the shallow justifications for acts of violence and the pursuit of love." [Part 10]
- The end would involve phenomena in the mirror.
- There would be no worthwhile means in relation.
- The means in relation to shallow desire.
- The end in relation to stabilizing accord.
- The visions of an end established as evolving phenomena vs static phenomena
- The means in relation to the end involving static phenomena
- How to determine the shallow justifications?
- For example, the end as innovation, unforeseen design manifesting, would involve evolving phenomena.
- Results manifested would include ongoing and developing benefits
*Note, I say Rhizomatics, as the Deleuzian approach fosters an accessibility among evolving phenomena. There is a context of multiplicity in relation to singular assemblage record. The justifications for such activities wouldn't be shallow, and working in relation to the needed wellspring of developing benefit. There is depth to the activity by design. This links to my narrative computation involving agency and the nodes "initiate" and "justification."
