Upon revealing an initial project, half were like leave it as it is...others were like, let me know when you finish. Which, a lot of people aren't going to even get elegant decay. It's like living in NOLA, and serving, and I remember serving a lady from Boston. She hated NOLA and it was her first day. She said it was so dirty and unkempt. I found a lot of humor in that. Meaning, the issues were dirty brick, vines and vegetation growing out of the buildings, and yet, that is part of the charm of the city. In fact, a lot of people from all over the world come to be around a place that embraces elegant decay, and it's not simply a term I coined. It's a known matter, and yet, there are few places that appreciate that kind of thing. So when I get a half split on it, I'm happy with that. It's a divided audience, which reads much better than the sugary pretty little impression thing, that people enjoy and yet, it's a valueless type of thing. It's pretty, but it doesn't have a voice. I'll still do some of that, but it's something that I don't take so seriously, even if it looks so...impressive for the visual at the surface. I'm not interested in the surface. I'd much rather have grime and decay. It's why I did some post after the art post...to kind of delve into why I'd prefer to be Drab. The surface is purely fucking evil. If I'm signing off on something physical, I'd much rather have it in relation to something that gets the mind to open up...so okay, it's unfinished it seems. In what way does one assume it is unfinished. Maybe it isn't polished, like a brutalist form of architecture? Maybe the walls need more paint, rather than offering something a bit more sobering, why? What is being satisfied with all that gloss and perfection. It's where I get into Ron English and Kara Walker, and there play on this Disneyfied aesthetic system. Much like commercial juxtaposed with decay, of something always presented with these sterilized presentations, encountering formations found in nature. A lot of presentations I grew up with had aspects of elegant decay, and it was something always appreciated. I think there are people who just don't get it, and others who do. I'll take that kind of response. No sense in being everything to everyone. It's to be DRAB, not HAPPY, or PRETTY PRETTY. I have decor projects that can be pretty, but again, it's not Art, it's at the surface, and most often, voiceless by design. Even among ART, the stuff I gravitate toward, is frictional in some way, where it is far removed from safe acceptable convention and offers elements that wouldn't play into notions of ease. I think of Piss Christ for example, where it is beautiful, and yet, the process finds people having strong responses, and yet that response is in relation to the process. To me that's always been a good example, of what makes artistry effective. It's more likely the form will have people responding to the visual at the surface. That's not so effective. That is my elegant decay work. The process isn't so interesting, in relation to the visual. The visual, seems interesting enough, but the process, is simply what one would expect, to paint, and that's that. Granted I will do informatic stuff in the future and that changes. Still, this is what I consider of at least offering some friction in some type of way, if not the process, at least the visual. Something to disrupt that safe and sound, at the surface mentality, that tends to predominate when we even mention the terms art, Art, ART. Damien Hirst, when there is a dissection involved does this, as I have seen these works in-person, and unlike a lot of works, the responses are strongly impacted. It's not eyes, but to see the innards on display, of this internality, when culturally, the West, emphasizes this comfort and almost exclusive desire for the externality. Even fucking isn't commonly involving large public bath houses, but rather anything to do with bodily fluids or internals is often residing within heightened layers of spaces private/away from a shared view. No other pieces in the area where his work was being displayed in New York were doing that. Piss Christ I think would be a good pairing, simply to note how people would reflect in relation. What I remember, was viewers quickly surprised, quickly moving back to matters of externality...which I think gets back into the works of Kara Walker and Ron English and how that cultural conditioning plays into a safehouse for violence.
Maybe at some point I will go from Art to ART. I already think that will be given, in that the informatic, I want to run, with the slogans, painted in this elegant decay fashion, where there is this rustic, folk, aesthetic with a subject matter that is more institutional in terms of the processes used. I haven't seen that, and it's something that is entirely me. Growing up on a dirt road...and then somehow attending school in Scotland, living next to a castle, studying in relation to a degree, and experimenting with this new type of affair, academically, termed as informatics...and no, it's not computer science, which focuses on categories, but rather, a differing emphasis of information arrangements, and that split makes sense, just like in chemistry and physics. These fundamental ways of adhering to a particular conceptualization, and building up from that notion. Information as a single scientific discipline doesn't make much sense, consider we can work from different fundamental conceptualizations of information itself. So yes, there will be multiple disciplines and informatics, the studies that emphasize the newer ways information can be arranged, would differ from information as categorical splits. There is likely disagreement and debates, as usual. I'm not seeking to focus on winning any kind of debate, rather it's simply using the informatic arrangement, to develop folk art signage with in-depth works, such as the works of Baudrillard, Focault, Derrida, etc... Imagine that. This Howard Finster, art fair type of aesthetic with signage working among an informatic method with sayings that are entirely institutional. It is me. It's not this desire to be unique moment. No, it is simply adhering to what i grew up with, and my process, all the way through graduate school in Scotland. It will be unique, but it's not to be unique, it's just be, as I am, which is indeed going to be distinctively unique. Again, I grew up on a dirt road...I would eat boiled peanuts every Sunday. It wasn't wholesome. It was kind of drab, but the folk art was cool, the fruit stand(s) were interesting, considering the products were often random, like tomatoes with Mr. T Whoopee Cusions, strange fruit drinks from the phillipines, cracklin and cornbread, boiled peanuts, no name candies, with the common affair, like bazooka, wrigleys, mars candies, etc...there was very little around, not even a McDonalds. It's not like that now, the area is less than an hour away from the world's busiest airport, so I wouldn't really say I'm "small town." By middle school all my friends changed entirely from being local, to being from all around the country primarily, and some around the world, UK primarily. I think this makes me a hybrid of some sort, like an AmeriScoodle. I did live in Scotland enough...and the primarily influences I have are international, even thought he first decade was absolutely southern and highly isolated. It just doesn't make sense growing up in that way. I don't recommend it, but the whole oddity of that kind of influence I think does hold interest, for some at least. It's a schizoid backdrop, like a novel written by W. Faulkner and C. Barker. Maybe? A disjointed cultural clashing of sorts, not immersed entirely in but outside to the inside, of both, wondering type of matter...only not as an adult, but rather as someone growing up. We go from dirt roads, fruit stands, very little around in terms of shopping and food, to olympics, airports, unis, travel around the country, living in Europe, living around the US, music, academics, art...it's off-beat and jarring, much like my preferred aesthetic, Howard Finster speaks the same language, in terms of aesthetic presenation, but the ideas I work from, including informatic methods...again off-beat. Institutional oddity at best, but it is the design reasonating in relation to these influences. I will be unapologetic about this. These are simply the influences I had. It might be weird. It might be unifinished to some. I can't care about this. I'm not here to be everything to everyone. Some will get it, others will not. It's just how it is for all of us. And the words can't really get to the aesthetic approach. It's just something we can hang on the wall that does a better job at articuling this process....more stuff, on the way.
And it seems there is this prove yourself type of attitude, but I already have. Let me know what you've done in terms of process, and the levels you have taken matters, if that's the attitude. People who follow where I have been, already know, he doesn't have to prove himself at all. Additionally, in terms of art and design, I have demonstrated a range, that can go from detailed and commercial to something that is rustic and non-commercial. So I do find intrigue, when certain personalities, not even knowing my range, will run with the rustic approach in a way that serves ill intent. It's not a lot, but it's there. I just can't relate to that type of energy, especially when one hasn't done the first thing in terms of process at any rigorous level. I'm realizing that's insecurity, and it's something that considering where I have been, I don't need to create barriers, as it is simply a waste of energy. Rather, if anything, maybe find ways of encouraging, or at the very least, empathizing with the attitude. I think that aspect to an audience will always be there for everyone. And maybe someone just has a different approach to life. That's not what I mean, by insecurity. People who simply want to enjoy something aren't going in that direction. It seems, people who want something in terms of process, and yet, they haven't but that work in, seem to be the culprits. Not all, but just certain personalities where no, it's not intended to be anything other than a parochial, closed-off, mentality, tinged with resentment and insecurity. Again, it's there for everyone I think. It's just something you take in with the good. I guess. I just don't really know what the approach would be, but being an asshole doesn't make much sense. People are free to think whatever they like. People are free to be assholes. They are not the focus of my process.